<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Essence of Science, Essence of Common Sense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.paradigm-sys.com/archives/292/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.paradigm-sys.com/archives/292</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omnipleasant</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigm-sys.com/archives/292/comment-page-1#comment-17566</link>
		<dc:creator>Omnipleasant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigm-sys.com/?p=292#comment-17566</guid>
		<description>You guys might like this article:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/fail_accept_defeat/&quot;&gt;Accept Defeat: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys might like this article:<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/fail_accept_defeat/">Accept Defeat: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://blog.paradigm-sys.com/archives/292/comment-page-1#comment-17564</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.paradigm-sys.com/?p=292#comment-17564</guid>
		<description>Dr Tart,

Are you suggesting that even someone with anomalous perceptions can contribute to a scientific study of such experiences as a scientist and not simply as a &quot;lab rat&quot; to be studied?

I worry about being able to be a scientist because of the way I see the world. If I&#039;m not experiencing the same stuff that everyone else does, doesn&#039;t that bring my ability to percieve things correctly into question? I&#039;ve recently been asked to participate in a study of unusual experiences, and have even been given the option of co-authorship in whatever paper is published on this work. There is a part of me that thinks I should just sit back and be a good lab rat for the nice scientists, because I do question my own perceptions and worry that these experiences make me a &quot;bad scientist&quot;. On the other hand, I would really like to contribute fully as both a subject and a scientist.

Do you think such a thing is possible to do within a proper scientific framework?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Tart,</p>
<p>Are you suggesting that even someone with anomalous perceptions can contribute to a scientific study of such experiences as a scientist and not simply as a &#8220;lab rat&#8221; to be studied?</p>
<p>I worry about being able to be a scientist because of the way I see the world. If I&#8217;m not experiencing the same stuff that everyone else does, doesn&#8217;t that bring my ability to percieve things correctly into question? I&#8217;ve recently been asked to participate in a study of unusual experiences, and have even been given the option of co-authorship in whatever paper is published on this work. There is a part of me that thinks I should just sit back and be a good lab rat for the nice scientists, because I do question my own perceptions and worry that these experiences make me a &#8220;bad scientist&#8221;. On the other hand, I would really like to contribute fully as both a subject and a scientist.</p>
<p>Do you think such a thing is possible to do within a proper scientific framework?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

